AI content detection

Detectors try to guess if text was written by a model. They are shaky. Using them as a GEO quality bar is a mistake.

Humans care if the page is wrong or empty. Models care if it is useful and corroborated. A detector score is neither.

Ironic twist: detectors flag stiff “expert” copy — including some human SEO writing.

Examples

A team rewrites with a “humanizer” until a detector is happy and the page loses all the numbers that were worth citing.

Scaled, low-value machine text aimed at search or AI retrieval. It pollutes indexes and makes your original work harder to find.

The messy set of clues engines use to decide if a page is worth ranking or citing: originality, evidence, UX, reputation.

Google’s language for pages made for humans. It also describes what is worth citing: experience, specifics, no empty calories.

Will Google punish AI writing? +

Google says they punish unhelpful spam, not AI as a tool. If the page is empty calories, you are in trouble regardless of who typed it.

See Reddit threads and AI answers for your brand in one place. Start with a free analysis.

Get started